jon

"Exploring Collective Fundraising for Multi-Project Individuals"

Jan 28, 2024 - 9:46pmSummary: A group of individuals involved in multiple projects are considering a collective fundraiser to generate a one-year financial runway for each member and cover additional costs like servers and events. The calculated sum needed is $740,000, which includes personal runways, server costs, and retreats. While proposing that Relational could operate as a non-profit, there's a recognition that setting up individual incorporations could be cumbersome. Discussions focus on leveraging their experience and shared goals in AI, crypto, and productivity tools, with Chad expressing support for the idea, citing the importance of direction, track record, and understanding potential outcomes.

Text

a wild idea has been floating around the back of my mind. I'm in a circle of projects. I love helping and getting into the code on all of these projects. I helped start several of these. many of these have revenue potential but all of them need money today. has a group raise ever been done? effectively a fundraise that goes to all of us - as individuals and as a group. the intent to help each other out, be each other's first customers and testers, and bake in cross compatibility and protocol stuff when possible.

what would the structure of this thing be?

something like. 1 year of runway per person at $80k. back of the napkin is 8 * 80 = $640,000. another $100k for server costs and llms and deploy eth. 4 in-person retreats at $10k per.

could it be under the relational umbrella?

relational could be a non-profit here. but i don't think np is actually beneficial here. I think it's a label. would everyone need to have things incorporated? that would be exhausting.

chad wrote:

I love the idea. It could certainly happen.

I think it would just depend on the general direction of the ideas the friends have, track record, and a shared understanding of potential outcomes.

general direction: creative uses of AI, crypto, and interfaces for note-taking, digital gardening, sensemaking, and productivity.

past history: all of us have experience shipping things. all of have experience building with each other.

potential outcomes: tbd

Similar Entrees

"Exploring Collaborative Event Planning and Online Community Dynamics"

83.89% similar

After a hike, I encountered Steph, leading to ongoing communication about hosting events. We discussed her co-organized salon on the AI alignment problem in March and my interest in hosting a website-building event during startup week, potentially in April or May. We also contemplated a tool for managing our projects and events, like a specialized project management software. Further, we talked about the connection between online communities and the physical gatherings they can inspire, emphasizing the cyclical relationship between the two.

"Productive Monday Morning: Projects, Intentions, and Explorations"

80.95% similar

The speaker did not complete their weekly review, which usually provides clarity and insights for the upcoming week. Despite this, they have many projects, personal life commitments, and community efforts to attend to, not to mention taxes. They plan to set week intentions using voice instead of writing, including the exploration of websites for the Diagram Website Explorers Club and developing a Canvas element-based editor for Daily Jam. The technical aspects of this project involve real-time data updates, efficient pixel manipulation, and secure user authentication through tokenization. A function is set to run every five seconds to update the canvas with the latest pixel data, ensuring all viewers see a consistent image while minimizing performance impacts. Other tasks include preparing tax paperwork, organizing Boulder events for systems and AI, and sketching ideas for a project called "co-net." The intention is to spend more time outdoors in the nice weather and to schedule the next "Site Craft Hang," while thinking about potential content for the "Explorers Club" website. Overall, it's a productive Monday morning with good weather contributing to a positive start to the week.

"Preserving Work and Experiences: Challenges and Solutions"

80.48% similar

The author is reflecting on the challenges of effectively showcasing their work on the internet, particularly in relation to portfolios and resumes. They express frustration with the limitations of resumes in capturing the depth of their experience and contributions. Additionally, they discuss the ongoing financial and practical challenges of maintaining online projects and the importance of preserving past work for the benefit of future creators. The author considers using archive.org as a potential solution but expresses reservations about outsourcing this responsibility to a non-profit organization. They ultimately prioritize the use of such resources for preserving knowledge that benefits the broader community rather than their own personal or professional work. The speaker is exploring the idea of preserving their work and experiences in a meaningful and sustainable way. They express concerns about relying on external platforms like archive.org and consider alternatives such as hosting their own content and encoding it into a lower fidelity medium. They also discuss the concept of creating their own encapsulation and representation of their work, which they hope will be more long-term sustainable. The text discusses the idea of creating a collaborative storytelling and writing platform that acts as a memory time capsule by archiving and snapshotting links. It addresses the challenge of link rot and suggests that decentralized hosting and a network of machines could potentially help in the future. The text discusses the concept of a scoped IPFS that functions similar to RAID, where each file is known only once but stored multiple times based on its significance. It also touches on the importance of data permanence on the internet, addressing concerns about archiving family photos and trusting companies like iCloud to maintain data indefinitely. The author questions if they should trust these companies and expresses uncertainty about the longevity of their data stored on such platforms.